Category: Software Comparisons

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

Aravo vs. EvaluationsHub: Who Wins on Supplier Evaluations, Speed, and Accountability?

In highly regulated industries, Aravo is a well-known name. It provides governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) software designed to help enterprises manage third-party risk. But when procurement teams, quality managers, or sustainability leaders want to run evaluations, automate scorecards, and create accountability—Aravo often becomes too heavy, too slow, and too complex.

That’s where EvaluationsHub comes in.

EvaluationsHub is purpose-built to run supplier and customer evaluations at scale, across multiple departments and use cases—without the implementation burden or price tag of legacy GRC platforms.

If your team is stuck between spreadsheets, compliance checklists, and overly complex software, this comparison is for you.

Aravo: Powerful, but Process-Heavy

Aravo excels at enterprise-level compliance workflows. It offers powerful GRC functionality for regulated industries like financial services, pharma, and defense. But many users describe the platform as slow to configure, difficult to maintain, and dependent on consultants for changes.

For companies that simply want to:

  • Roll out ESG or risk assessments

  • Automate supplier scorecards

  • Collect post-onboarding feedback

  • Track supplier or customer actions

…it’s too much tool for too little agility.

EvaluationsHub: Focused, Fast, and Feedback-Driven

EvaluationsHub strips away the complexity. It focuses entirely on what modern supplier and customer-facing teams need most: structured evaluations, smart automation, and fast deployment.

From supplier risk scorecards to post-project customer reviews, EvaluationsHub helps you:

  • Push templates to any stakeholder (internal or external)

  • Collect and score feedback automatically

  • Track next steps with full accountability

  • Close the loop — and prove it

You don’t need to build a GRC program. You just need a platform that makes evaluations work.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Aravo vs. EvaluationsHub

Feature/Capability Aravo EvaluationsHub
Primary Focus GRC / Risk Management Supplier & customer evaluations, scorecards, feedback loops
Regulatory Compliance ✔️ Deep capabilities ✔️ Supports ISO, ESG, and risk evaluations
Speed of Implementation ⚠️ 6–12 months typical ✅ Days – run evaluations from day one
Supplier Scorecards ✔️ With configuration ✔️ Native, automated, and flexible
Internal Department Feedback ✖️ Not a core use case ✔️ Easily push to any internal stakeholder
Customer-Facing Evaluations ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – full portal and branded experience
Template Flexibility ⚠️ Complex, consultant-driven ✔️ Drag-and-drop builder, no-code
Automation (reminders, scoring) ⚠️ Limited without config ✔️ Fully automated
Accountability & Loop Closure ✔️ With custom workflows ✔️ Built-in, per evaluation or question
Usability for Non-Experts ⚠️ Steep learning curve ✔️ Simple UX for any user
Pricing Enterprise-level Modular, affordable, includes 1 free managed account

Why EvaluationsHub Is the Smarter Fit for Agile Teams

Aravo makes sense for highly regulated companies with full-scale risk teams and long timelines. But if you’re a procurement leader, CX lead, or sustainability manager who needs to run evaluations quickly, gather structured input from multiple parties, and track what happens next, then Aravo is probably overkill.

EvaluationsHub gives you:

  • A flexible evaluation engine

  • Supplier and customer portals

  • A system that holds stakeholders accountable

  • Reports and scorecards without the spreadsheet chaos

All with minimal training and no need for a systems integrator.

Final Verdict

Aravo helps large enterprises check boxes.
EvaluationsHub helps modern teams drive outcomes.

If you want to move from compliance fatigue to continuous performance improvement, EvaluationsHub is the faster, leaner, and smarter path forward.

See It Live – Try EvaluationsHub with a Real Use Case

No sandbox. No sales calls. Just one fully managed free account to show how it works in your live workflow.

👉 Start your first evaluation here

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

In today’s rapidly evolving procurement landscape, companies demand more than just a supplier database—they need actionable insights, automated workflows, and real accountability. Two platforms often compared in this space are TealBook and EvaluationsHub. While both aim to support smarter supplier decisions, they take very different approaches.

If you’re looking for a platform that doesn’t just collect supplier data but actively manages evaluations, automates scorecards, and closes the feedback loop, EvaluationsHub may be the better fit. Let’s break down why.

TealBook: A Data Platform with Limits

TealBook is best known for its AI-driven supplier discovery and enrichment platform. It aggregates supplier data from various sources, cleans it, and makes it searchable, allowing procurement teams to discover new suppliers or validate existing ones. For vendor master enrichment, it’s a powerful engine.

But here’s the catch: TealBook stops at the data layer. It doesn’t run supplier evaluations, manage projects, or integrate dynamic feedback loops from internal or external stakeholders. It’s a static snapshot in a world that demands real-time, continuous improvement.

EvaluationsHub: Purpose-Built for Procurement Impact

EvaluationsHub goes further—it operationalizes supplier evaluations across your ecosystem, helping procurement teams not just track supplier performance, but improve it. Whether you want to run sustainability assessments, risk audits, or quality evaluations, EvaluationsHub allows you to push templates to suppliers, collect feedback automatically, and hold stakeholders accountable through closed-loop processes.

It isn’t just about data; it’s about delivering outcomes—faster decisions, better supplier performance, and measurable compliance.

Side-by-Side Comparison: TealBook vs. EvaluationsHub

Feature/Capability TealBook EvaluationsHub
Core Purpose Supplier data discovery and enrichment Supplier evaluations, feedback, and project execution
AI Supplier Discovery ✔️ Strong ✖️ Not the focus
Supplier Data Enrichment ✔️ Yes, centralized from multiple sources ✔️ Via direct evaluations from internal & external users
Dynamic Supplier Scorecards ✖️ Not offered ✔️ Fully automated and customizable
Push Templates to Stakeholders ✖️ No ✔️ Yes, including sustainability, risk, quality, etc.
Internal + External Feedback Loops ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – across departments, customers, and suppliers
Closed-Loop Accountability ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – track actions & responses
Custom Supplier Portals ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – branded portals for suppliers or customers
Pricing High, enterprise-level contracts Transparent, flexible, and affordable plans
Time to Value Weeks/months (data setup) Days – runs out-of-the-box with little setup
ISO Certification Support ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – e.g. ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ESG templates
Integration with Evaluation Tools ✖️ Not designed for it ✔️ Integrates with survey tools, NPS, 3rd-party workflows via Make.com
Use Case Breadth Supplier visibility Supplier improvement, risk, ESG, quality, onboarding, customer projects

Why Procurement Teams Are Choosing EvaluationsHub

If your main challenge is simply finding suppliers, TealBook is a solid choice. But if your real bottleneck is managing supplier performance, driving ESG or quality compliance, and automating scorecards across departments, EvaluationsHub gives you the tools to act—not just observe.

With EvaluationsHub, you can:

  • Push a standardized sustainability evaluation to 100+ suppliers in minutes

  • Let internal teams rate vendor performance quarterly without reminders

  • Provide customers with a branded portal to run co-developed initiatives

  • Create a traceable audit trail to support ISO certification

  • And much more—all without needing a separate BI team or manual follow-ups

The Verdict

TealBook gives you data. EvaluationsHub gives you action.
Procurement teams today aren’t short on supplier names—they’re short on time, insight, and operational leverage. EvaluationsHub fills that gap with a system that runs evaluations for you, tracks results, and keeps everyone accountable.

So if you’re ready to move from static supplier lists to living performance ecosystems, it’s time to give EvaluationsHub a try.

Curious how EvaluationsHub fits into your stack?

You can test it for free with one fully managed account — not a demo, but a real proof of concept.

👉 Start here with your first evaluation

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

EvaluationsHub vs. Anvyl: Going Beyond Visibility to True Supplier Accountability

As digital procurement gains momentum, platforms like Anvyl and EvaluationsHub are helping organizations modernize how they interact with suppliers. Both claim to improve supply chain collaboration—but they take very different routes.

Anvyl is a supply chain visibility and PO management tool. It streamlines supplier communications, tracks production timelines, and centralizes purchase orders and shipments.

EvaluationsHub, on the other hand, is built for performance evaluation, feedback automation, and improvement tracking—for both internal and external stakeholders.

So which platform fits your needs best?

It depends:
If you’re trying to automate evaluations, run scorecards, and improve supplier relationships through structured accountability, EvaluationsHub is likely the better fit.

What Anvyl Does Well

Anvyl excels in operational visibility. It’s designed for supply chain teams to:

  • Track PO status and production milestones

  • Centralize documents and communications

  • Monitor delays and lead time risks

It’s especially useful for consumer goods and hardware brands with overseas production partners. But while it helps you manage what is happening with your suppliers, it doesn’t go very far in helping you assess how well things are going—or what needs to change.

There’s no robust evaluation engine, no stakeholder input collection, and no automated improvement loop.

EvaluationsHub: Designed for Supplier Feedback, Scorecards & Continuous Improvement

EvaluationsHub complements your supply chain stack by giving you a structured system for measuring supplier performance, collecting feedback, and triggering improvements.

Instead of chasing answers in spreadsheets or scattered survey tools, you can:

  • Launch evaluation templates (ESG, risk, quality, delivery, onboarding)

  • Push them to internal teams, customers, or suppliers

  • Automatically score results and track follow-ups

  • Offer suppliers a branded experience with custom portals

  • Close the loop — and prove it

It’s not about tracking POs. It’s about tracking performance.

Comparison: EvaluationsHub vs. Anvyl

Capability Anvyl EvaluationsHub
Primary Focus Supply chain visibility & PO tracking Supplier & customer evaluation and feedback
Purchase Order Management ✔️ Core feature ✖️ Not in scope
Evaluation Workflows ✖️ Not supported ✔️ Built-in engine for supplier/customer/internal assessments
ESG/Risk/Quality Templates ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – standard and customizable
Internal Feedback Collection ✖️ Not a focus ✔️ Push templates across departments easily
Automated Scorecards ✖️ Manual at best ✔️ Automatic scoring, aggregation, and reporting
Reminders & Loop Closure ✖️ No ✔️ Smart automation of follow-ups and actions
Branded Supplier Portals ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – provide co-branded experience to suppliers or customers
Use in Onboarding / Post-Delivery ✖️ Not designed for it ✔️ Ideal for onboarding evaluations, project feedback, and audits
Pricing & Implementation Mid to high, focused on ops Modular, transparent, fast to deploy

Why Procurement Teams Are Layering in EvaluationsHub

Many operations teams using Anvyl or similar tools eventually find themselves needing a better way to:

  • Evaluate supplier reliability and performance (not just shipment timing)

  • Involve internal teams in scoring delivery quality or collaboration

  • Run ESG, compliance, or onboarding assessments without messy workarounds

That’s exactly where EvaluationsHub steps in.

You can keep Anvyl for PO tracking—but plug in EvaluationsHub to run structured evaluations that drive accountability and improvement.

It’s the missing feedback layer that transforms good suppliers into great ones.

Final Thoughts

Anvyl is a solid tool for managing transactions.
EvaluationsHub is built for managing performance.

If your goal is to build stronger supplier relationships, track results over time, and engage your stakeholders in meaningful evaluations, EvaluationsHub gives you the automation and structure that Anvyl doesn’t aim to provide.

See the Difference in a Real Use Case

EvaluationsHub lets you launch a fully managed evaluation for free—so you can try it without technical setup or sales friction.

👉 Start your first structured evaluation now

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

Introduction

In today’s fast-paced business environment, choosing the right evaluation platform can significantly impact your organization’s efficiency and decision-making capabilities. This article provides a detailed comparison between two prominent platforms: Graphite Connect and EvaluationsHub. By examining their features, integrations, and unique offerings, we aim to help you make an informed decision that aligns with your business needs.

Key Features Comparison

 

Feature EvaluationsHub Graphite Connect
Feedback Automation Central to its offering, minimizing manual effort. Lacks dedicated automation for feedback processes.
Customizable Evaluations Tailored scorecards, criteria, and methods available. Standardized evaluation templates with limited customization options.
Multi-Metric Evaluation Diverse methods for a comprehensive view. Mainly focuses on basic metrics without extensive multi-metric support.

📊 Graphite Connect vs EvaluationsHub: Feature Comparison

Feature Graphite Connect EvaluationsHub
Core Focus Supplier onboarding and risk management Supplier evaluations and performance management
Automation Automates supplier onboarding, risk scoring, and data validation Automates evaluation workflows, scoring, and feedback collection
Customization Custom workflows and document management Highly customizable scorecards, criteria, and evaluation templates
Integration Capabilities Full integration with ERPs and procurement tools Fully Integrates with over 1600 tools, including all major SRM systems
Supplier Risk Management Built-in risk scoring, OFAC/TIN validation, and fraud prevention part of the full collection of  supplier performance evaluations
Collaboration Tools In-app communication, centralized document sharing Real-time collaboration on evaluations, comments, and scoring
Data Management Single supplier profile shared across the network; validated and secure Centralized evaluation data with historical tracking and analytics
Security & Compliance Features including audit trails and fraud prevention Strong security features, GDPR-compliant, with secure access controls and audit logs
User Experience Designed for procurement teams; some users report friction when adding new contacts Designed for evaluators and procurement teams; praised for ease of use and flexibility
Pricing Model Based on modules, number of suppliers, and onboarding volume (e.g., $25,000/year flat rate reported) Very predictable pricing. Per supplier account starting at 3€ per month, everything unlimited.

source: Capterra 

Differentiators of EvaluationsHub

The following aspects highlight why EvaluationsHub stands out in the market:

  • Broad Integration: With connectivity across over 1600 tools, including strong integration with Salesforce, EvaluationsHub ensures seamless data flow within existing systems.
  • User-Friendly Platform: Its no-code setup allows users to easily create evaluations and manage feedback without technical expertise.
  • Actionable Insights: Provides data-driven reports that facilitate informed decision-making processes based on collected feedback.
  • Simplified Supplier Engagement: The dedicated supplier portal offers a specific interface for suppliers to interact efficiently with the platform’s functionalities.
  • Cost-effective model: A potential pricing model of “3€/managed customer/supplier” suggests affordability compared to high-cost enterprise suites.

User Experience & Security Considerations

The user experience is crucial when selecting an evaluation platform. EvaluationsHub prioritizes ease of use through its intuitive interface that requires no coding skills. Additionally, its commitment towards GDPR compliance underscores robust security measures ensuring data privacy—a critical factor in today’s regulatory landscape.

In contrast, Graphite Connect offers standard user interfaces but lacks advanced customization options found in EvaluationsHub’s white-labeling capability which allows businesses to brand their platforms according to company guidelines.

Pricing & Trial Options

A significant advantage offered by Evaluation Hub includes free trials or versions enabling potential customers low-barrier access before committing financially—an attractive proposition especially for small-to-medium enterprises looking to test functionalities firsthand without upfront costs involved initially.

GraphiteConnect does not provide similar flexible entry points making it less appealing particularly for budget-conscious organizations exploring new solutions within constrained financial frameworks.

Conclusion

This comparison highlights how both platforms cater differently depending on specific organizational requirements; however, EvaluationsHub emerges as amore versatile choice given its extensive feature set coupled with competitive pricing models and superior integration capabilities—all contributing factors towards enhanced operational efficiency and strategic growth opportunities long-term.

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

EvaluationsHub publishes this comparison, so treat it as an interested party’s account and check the links. Every claim about Kodiak Hub is sourced to a page Kodiak Hub publishes, with the date we read it. Where something is not public, we say so rather than guessing. Last reviewed 29 September 2026.

The short version

These two overlap more than most pairs on this site. Both are European SRM platforms with weighted supplier scorecards, sustainability criteria inside the score, and corrective actions attached to the result. The honest differences are narrower and more specific than either marketing site suggests.

Kodiak Hub’s distinguishing strength is that third-party risk intelligence is built into the product as modules rather than something you contract separately. Ours is that the lifecycle starts earlier, at intake and RFx, and that the review cadence itself is the product.

What Kodiak Hub is

Kodiak Hub is a cloud-based supplier relationship management suite, founded in 2016 and headquartered in Stockholm, with offices in Gdansk, London, Munich and Boston. It was formerly called Kodiak Rating. Malin Schmidt is founder and CEO. It raised a Series A led by blq invest announced in April 2023, and further investment from Oxx. (Company, Series A, name change.)

Their homepage headline is "The SRM suite that makes you smarter" and they claim the category "Supplier Relationship Management Suite". (Source.)

They publish six platform modules, each with an internal codename: Goals and Procurement Strategy Management; Supplier Onboarding and Assessment; Supply Chain Risk and Resilience Monitoring; Supplier Performance Management; Supplier Collaboration and Innovation; and Supplier Audit Management. (Platform.)

Where Kodiak Hub is the stronger choice

This section is honest, because the rest of the page is worth nothing otherwise.

Third-party risk intelligence is built in, not contracted separately. This is their clearest advantage. Financial assessments and credit ratings, macro risk, sanctions and PEP screening, and adverse media monitoring are published as product modules rather than integrations you have to buy and wire up. If you want that on the supplier record without signing separate data contracts, that is a genuine reason to choose them. (Platform.)

An on-site audit application. Field audit capture inside the same platform as the scorecards is a capability plenty of SRM vendors do not offer. (Supplier Audit Management.)

Real scorecard depth. Their performance module publishes named dimensions across quality, delivery, commercial, collaboration and innovation, plus sustainability covering health and safety, labour and human rights, environmental management and ethics, and risk covering macro, financial, adverse media, sanctions and PEPs. Customisable KPIs and rating schemes, per-supplier targets, and benchmarking are all published. This is not a reporting veneer. (Supplier Performance Management, scorecards.)

Improvement is a first-class module. Corrective and preventive action schemes sit in their own module linked to performance data, so measurement connects to remediation inside one system. (Collaboration and Innovation.)

Named customer outcomes. They publish specific figures against named customers: Elfa at 58% fewer claims and a threefold faster qualification, HANZA at 400 admin hours saved per year and 50% faster supplier response cycles, MM Packaging unifying 53 plants, and HL Display reducing a supplier self-assessment cycle from 8 to 10 months down to 3 weeks. Published, attributed outcome figures are rarer in this category than they should be. (Case studies.)

Consistent usability scores. Ease of use and customer support both score highly on Capterra, and ease of use plus responsive support are the dominant positive themes on G2. Two independent platforms agreeing makes that credible rather than cherry-picked. (Capterra, G2.)

What EvaluationsHub is

EvaluationsHub is a full supplier lifecycle management platform. Two integrated products cover the lifecycle end to end, sharing one supplier record, one permission model and one reporting layer rather than sitting next to each other and exchanging files.

InitiativesHub covers everything before the relationship exists: intake and needs capture, RFx across RFI, RFQ and RFP with bid comparison, qualification scoring and selection, awarding, contract with SLA and renewal alerts, and guided onboarding.

EvaluationsHub covers everything after it does: continuous risk scoring, CSRD-ready ESG evidence collection, weighted performance KPIs, corrective actions triggered automatically with owners and due dates, and quarterly business reviews. Eva AI cross-checks contract obligations against live performance data and flags drift against your acceptance thresholds, with human approval required before anything executes.

That is the whole lifecycle in one platform: intake, sourcing, award, onboarding, performance, risk, compliance, corrective action and review. Four design decisions matter in a comparison like this one.

The evaluation cadence is the product, not a reporting module. Scoring, reminders, escalation, CAPA recurrence and document collection are included in every deployment rather than sold as automation add-ons. Suppliers work inside the same two-way workspace, see their own scorecard, and close actions with you.

Multi-stakeholder scoring is native. Quality, operations, engineering and category management score the same supplier against weighted criteria, and the platform resolves that into one comparable result instead of one buyer’s opinion.

Standalone or layered, your choice. No ERP is required. Import your supplier list and run the full lifecycle, or layer it on SAP, Oracle, Dynamics or Coupa with bidirectional sync and no duplicate entry. You do not need a master data programme to finish before you can start measuring performance, and most teams run their first evaluation cycle in three to four weeks with their own suppliers and data.

European by default, enterprise-ready. ISO 27001 certified, hosted on AWS eu-west-3 in Paris, encrypted at rest and in transit, data does not leave Europe, DPA on request. Larger deployments run SSO and SAML with Okta, Azure AD or Google Workspace, SCIM provisioning, and multi-entity governance. Rated 4.9 out of 5 on G2, across 350+ procurement teams.

Side by side

Kodiak Hub and EvaluationsHub compared. Kodiak Hub claims sourced to their own pages read 29 September 2026. "Not published" means the vendor does not state it publicly.
Dimension Kodiak Hub EvaluationsHub Who this favours
Embedded third-party risk data Financial and credit, macro risk, sanctions and PEP screening, adverse media published as product modules Risk scoring on your data and documents; external feeds via integration rather than resold by us Kodiak Hub. Clearly theirs
On-site audit capture Dedicated on-site audit application Audit evidence and documents held against the supplier record, without a dedicated field app Kodiak Hub for field auditing
Sourcing before the relationship exists Six published modules cover onboarding and self-assessment. RFx, bid comparison and awarding are not among them InitiativesHub covers intake, RFx across RFI, RFQ and RFP, qualification, awarding and contract EvaluationsHub. One platform from need to scorecard
Named ERP integrations No ERP is named publicly. Coupa and SAP Ariba are the two named source-to-pay systems SAP, Oracle, Dynamics and Coupa named, bidirectional, plus a native SAP connector listed in the SAP App Center EvaluationsHub if a named ERP path matters before contract
Evaluation cadence and escalation Real-time updates and automated notifications published. Cadence defaults and escalation rules not published Recurrence, reminders, escalation and CAPA follow-up are configured per programme and included in every deployment EvaluationsHub on the review loop
Multi-stakeholder internal scoring Not published as a named capability Native. Several functions score the same supplier and the platform resolves one comparable result EvaluationsHub
Contract obligations versus live performance Not published Eva AI cross-checks obligations against delivered performance and flags drift, with human approval before action EvaluationsHub for value leakage and contract drift
Commercial model No pricing page; their pricing URL returns 404. Obtained via demo request Per supplier actively managed, not per seat. Internal team and all supplier portal users included. Volume tiers automatic EvaluationsHub. You can reason about cost before a call
Scorecard weighting mechanics Customisable KPIs and rating schemes published. How weights are set and governed is not Weighted criteria per programme and per supplier tier, set by you and visible to the supplier EvaluationsHub on published detail
Supplier-facing scorecard visibility Collaboration tools and progress monitoring published. Whether suppliers see their own scorecard is not stated Suppliers see their own scorecard and work the improvement plan in the same two-way workspace EvaluationsHub on published detail
Security and residency ISO/IEC 27001 certified, SSO, 2FA, encryption in transit and at rest ISO 27001 certified, AWS eu-west-3 Paris, data stays in Europe, DPA on request, SSO and SAML, SCIM Both strong. EvaluationsHub if EU residency is explicit in your review
Sustainability inside the score Health and safety, labour and human rights, environmental management, ethics and anti-corruption CSRD-ready ESG evidence collected continuously and reportable Both, and both are credible

Choose Kodiak Hub if

  • You want credit, sanctions, PEP and adverse media intelligence supplied by the vendor rather than contracted separately.
  • On-site supplier audits must be captured in the field, in the same system as the scorecards.
  • Your existing source-to-pay stack is Coupa or SAP Ariba, the two systems they name.
  • You are buying on usability above all, and want a shortlist that scores consistently well on that across independent review sites.
  • You want a Nordic-headquartered vendor with published, named customer outcome figures you can reference.

Choose EvaluationsHub if

  • The programme starts before the supplier does, and you want intake, RFx, qualification and awarding in the same platform as the scorecard that follows.
  • The review loop is the point: recurrence, reminders, escalation, and corrective actions that actually close.
  • Several functions need to score the same supplier and you want one comparable result rather than one buyer’s opinion.
  • You need a named ERP integration path, or a native SAP connector, evidenced before you sign.
  • You are chasing value leakage and contract drift, and want obligations checked against what suppliers actually delivered.
  • EU data residency has to be explicit, with ISO 27001 and hosting you can name in a security review.

What we cannot tell you

  • How Kodiak Hub prices. They publish no pricing page and their pricing URL returns a 404, so you will have to ask them.
  • Which ERPs they integrate with. They describe a bring-your-own-license approach, custom API integrations and plug-and-play functionality, but publish no named ERP list. Ask for one.
  • Which providers sit behind their risk modules. The market intelligence sources are described but not named.
  • Their implementation methodology or typical duration by scope. They publish speed claims but no phase model or project plan.
  • How their software feels in practice. We have read their documentation. We have not run it, and we will not characterise software we have not used.

Where that leaves you

If the reason you are looking is that nobody has a current view of supplier credit, sanctions exposure or adverse media, Kodiak Hub sells that as part of the product and we do not. That is a real reason to pick them and we would rather say so.

If the reason is that sourcing, onboarding and performance live in three different places, that nothing escalates, and that only one person’s opinion ends up in the score, the lifecycle we run is built for exactly that, and it starts at intake rather than at the scorecard.

Talk to us about your supplier programme, or see how pricing works.