Tag: Evaluation Platforms

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

In the dynamic landscape of evaluation and feedback management, choosing the right platform can be pivotal for businesses aiming to enhance their operational efficiency. Two prominent players in this domain are Prewave and EvaluationsHub. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these platforms, highlighting their features, strengths, and differentiators.

Overview

Both Prewave and EvaluationsHub offer robust solutions for managing evaluations and feedback within organizations. However, they cater to slightly different needs and priorities. Understanding these nuances is crucial for making an informed decision.

EvaluationsHub: Key Differentiators

  • Feedback Automation: Central to its offering, minimizing manual effort.
  • Highly Customizable Evaluations: Tailored scorecards, criteria, and methods.
  • Multi-Metric Evaluation: Ability to use many different methods for a comprehensive view.
  • Broad Integration (1600+ tools): Strong connectivity with existing business software, especially Salesforce integration.
  • Dedicated Supplier Portal: Provides a specific interface for suppliers to engage effectively.
  • Actionable Insights/Reporting: Focus on data-driven decision making from feedback.
  • User-Friendly/No-Code Platform: Ease of setup and use for creating evaluations and managing feedback without technical expertise.
  • Brandable/White-Labeling: Customization of the platform’s appearance with company branding options.
  • COST-EFFECTIVE Pricing Model:: Potentially competitive pricing model at “3€/managed customer/supplier.”

    .

    .

    .

    .

The Prewave Approach

The specifics of Prewave’s offerings are less detailed compared to EvaluationsHub; however, it is known for its focus on predictive analytics in supply chain risk management. While it offers some overlapping features with EvaluationsHub such as integration capabilities, its primary strength lies in risk prediction rather than comprehensive evaluation processes or customizable scorecards like those offered by EvaluationsHub.

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

In today’s fast-paced business environment, choosing the right evaluation and feedback platform is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage. Two prominent players in this space are Resilinc and EvaluationsHub. This article provides a detailed comparison of these platforms, highlighting their features, integrations, and unique offerings to help you make an informed decision.

Key Features Comparison

<

Feature EvaluationsHub Resilinc
Feedback Automation Yes – Minimizes manual effort No direct equivalent
Customizable Evaluations Highly customizable with tailored scorecards and criteria Limited customization options available
Multi-Metric Evaluation Diverse methods for comprehensive insights Lacks multi-metric capabilities as extensive as EvaluationsHub’s offering
Integration Capabilities Broad integration with 1600+ tools including Salesforce emphasis Narrower range of integrations compared to EvaluationsHub’s extensive network
User Interface & Customization


User-Friendly/No-Code Platform


Brandable/White-Labeling


GDPR Compliance


Cost-Effective Pricing Model

Dedicated Supplier Portal

Actionable Insights/Reporting

Corrective Action Planning (CAPA)

  • No-Code Platform: Easy setup and use for evaluations.
  • User-Friendly: Intuitive interface.
  • No-Code Platform: Easy setup and use for evaluations.
  • User-Friendly: Intuitive interface.

The platform offers a dedicated supplier portal that allows suppliers to engage directly with the system. This feature enhances communication efficiency between businesses and their suppliers.

The platform focuses on data-driven decision-making by providing actionable insights from feedback. This allows businesses to make informed decisions based on comprehensive reports generated by the system.

This feature supports addressing identified issues through corrective action planning. It ensures that problems are not only identified but also resolved efficiently.

Differentiators of EvaluationsHub Over Resilinc:

  • User-Friendly Interface: EvaluationsHub prioritizes ease of use with its no-code platform, making it accessible even for those without technical expertise.
  • Feedback Automation: Unlike Resilinc, EvaluationsHub automates feedback processes, significantly reducing manual efforts.
  • Diverse Integration: With over 1600 tool integrations, including a strong focus on Salesforce connectivity, it offers unmatched flexibility in connecting with existing systems.
  • Simplified Pricing Model: The potential cost-effectiveness of a per-supplier or per-customer pricing model makes it appealing for businesses looking to optimize costs without sacrificing functionality.

The Bottom Line: Why Choose EvaluationsHub?

If your organization values automation, customization, broad integration capabilities, and actionable insights from evaluations while ensuring GDPR compliance at a potentially cost-effective rate, EvaluationsHub warrants serious consideration over its competitors like Resilinc.

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

In today’s competitive business landscape, selecting the right evaluation platform is crucial for organizations aiming to streamline their feedback processes and enhance decision-making. This article provides a detailed comparison between two prominent platforms: HICX and EvaluationsHub. By examining their features, integrations, and unique offerings, we aim to assist you in making an informed choice.

Overview of HICX

HICX is known for its robust supplier management capabilities. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools designed to improve supplier relationships and ensure compliance with industry standards. Key features include:

  • Supplier Information Management: Centralized repository for all supplier-related data.
  • Risk Management: Tools to assess and mitigate potential risks associated with suppliers.
  • Compliance Tracking: Ensures adherence to regulatory requirements.

Overview of EvaluationsHub

EvaluationsHub stands out with its focus on feedback automation and customizable evaluations. The platform is designed to minimize manual efforts while providing actionable insights through data-driven reporting. Notable features include:

  • Feedback Automation: Streamlines the collection and analysis of feedback.
  • Highly Customizable Evaluations: Tailored scorecards, criteria, and methods for specific needs.
  • User-Friendly/No-Code Platform: Easy setup without technical expertise required.
  • Diverse Integrations: Connectivity with over 1600 tools, including strong integration with Salesforce.

A Detailed Comparison











Broad integration network supporting over 1600 tools including Salesforce

Summary Table:
Evaluated Features:
Evaluated Features:
User Experience:
User Experience:

 User-centric feedback automation &amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;
evaluation customization.
Cohesive supplier management &amp;amp;amp;
risk assessment.
Main Focus:

Main Focus:

User-centric feedback automation &
evaluation customization.

Cohesive supplier management &
risk assessment.

Main Focus:

User-centric feedback automation &
evaluation customization.

Cohesive supplier management &
risk assessment.

Main Focus:

User-centric feedback automation &
evaluation customization.

Cohesive supplier management &
risk assessment.

Main Focus:

User-centric feedback automation &
evaluation customization.

Cohesive supplier management &
risk assessment.

EVALUATIONSHUB HICX
Main Focus User-centric feedback automation & evaluation customization Cohesive supplier management & risk assessment
User Experience & Setup Ease (No-Code) User-friendly interface allows easy setup without coding knowledge
Emphasizes simplicity in creating evaluations		 Requires more technical knowledge for initial configuration
Main Focus: User-centric feedback automation & evaluation customization vs Cohesive supplier management & risk assessment (HICX) Strong emphasis on automating the feedback process
User Experience & Setup Ease (No-Code) User-friendly interface allows easy setup without coding knowledge
Emphasizes simplicity in creating evaluations
Requires more technical knowledge for initial configuration
Multi-Metric Evaluation Capability
(Ability to use various methods)		 Offers diverse metrics ensuring comprehensive assessments
(Highlights flexibility in evaluation approaches)




(Primarily focused on standard metrics related to supplier performance)
Integration Capabilities
(Connectivity with existing business software)

Differentiators That Make EvaluationsHub Stand Out

The following aspects highlight why many businesses choose EvaluationsHub over other platforms like HICX:

  • Diverse Integration Network: The ability to connect seamlessly with over 1600 tools ensures that businesses can integrate their existing systems effortlessly. This includes a particularly strong connection with Salesforce, which is vital for many organizations relying on this CRM system.
  • User-Centric Design: The no-code platform makes it accessible even to non-technical users who need quick setups or modifications.
  • Cost-Effective Pricing Model: A potential cost-effective pricing model based on managed customers/suppliers offers scalability according to business size.

  • GDPR Compliance And Security Measures :Ensures data privacy protection aligned With European Union regulations .

  • Corrective Action Planning Support :Directly addresses issues identified during evaluations , facilitating continuous improvement .

  • Brandable White – Labeling Options :Allows companies customize appearance according To Their branding guidelines .

    • < B DEDICATED SUPPLIER PORTAL : PROVIDES SPECIFIC INTERFACE FOR SUPPLIERS TO ENGAGE EFFECTIVELY WITH YOUR ORGANIZATION'S PROCESSES AND REQUIREMENTS .

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations are increasingly relying on evaluation platforms to streamline their feedback processes and enhance decision-making. Two prominent players in this domain are Gatekeeper and EvaluationsHub. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these two platforms, highlighting their key features, strengths, and differentiators.

Overview of Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper is a well-established platform known for its robust contract management capabilities. It offers a suite of tools designed to help businesses manage vendor relationships effectively. Key features include automated workflows, contract lifecycle management, and compliance tracking. While it excels in contract management, its evaluation capabilities may not be as extensive as some specialized platforms.

Overview of EvaluationsHub

EvaluationsHub stands out with its focus on feedback automation and multi-metric evaluations. It offers highly customizable evaluations tailored to specific business needs, allowing users to create personalized scorecards and criteria. With broad integration capabilities (over 1600 tools), particularly strong connectivity with Salesforce, EvaluationsHub ensures seamless data flow across existing software ecosystems.

Key Differentiators of EvaluationsHub

  • Feedback Automation: Minimizes manual effort by automating the feedback process.
  • Highly Customizable Evaluations: Allows for tailored scorecards and criteria specific to organizational needs.
  • Multi-Metric Evaluation: Provides a comprehensive view using various evaluation methods.
  • Broad Integration: Seamlessly connects with over 1600 tools including Salesforce.
  • User-Friendly/No-Code Platform: Easy setup and use without technical expertise required.
  • Brandable/White-Labeling: Customizes the platform’s appearance with company branding.
  • COST-EFFECTIVE PRICING MODEL:: Potentially competitive pricing at “3€/managed customer/supplier.”

A Detailed Comparison Table

<

<

>
<<>User-Friendliness <<>
<<>Requires some technical knowledge <<>
<<>No-code platform; easy setup <<>
<<

>


<<<

>>
<<>Data Security<<>>
<<>Standard security measures<<>>
<<>GDPR compliant; strong focus on privacy<<>>
<<<

>>

Conclusion

Both Gatekeeper and EvaluationsHub offer valuable solutions depending on your organization’s needs.
If your primary focus is on robust contract management,
Gatekeeper may be the right choice.
However,
if you seek an advanced evaluation platform that emphasizes customization,
automation,
broad integrations,
user-friendliness,
brandability
,and cost-effectiveness
,EvaluationsHub emerges as a compelling option.

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

EvaluationsHub vs. Anvyl: Going Beyond Visibility to True Supplier Accountability

As digital procurement gains momentum, platforms like Anvyl and EvaluationsHub are helping organizations modernize how they interact with suppliers. Both claim to improve supply chain collaboration—but they take very different routes.

Anvyl is a supply chain visibility and PO management tool. It streamlines supplier communications, tracks production timelines, and centralizes purchase orders and shipments.

EvaluationsHub, on the other hand, is built for performance evaluation, feedback automation, and improvement tracking—for both internal and external stakeholders.

So which platform fits your needs best?

It depends:
If you’re trying to automate evaluations, run scorecards, and improve supplier relationships through structured accountability, EvaluationsHub is likely the better fit.

What Anvyl Does Well

Anvyl excels in operational visibility. It’s designed for supply chain teams to:

  • Track PO status and production milestones

  • Centralize documents and communications

  • Monitor delays and lead time risks

It’s especially useful for consumer goods and hardware brands with overseas production partners. But while it helps you manage what is happening with your suppliers, it doesn’t go very far in helping you assess how well things are going—or what needs to change.

There’s no robust evaluation engine, no stakeholder input collection, and no automated improvement loop.

EvaluationsHub: Designed for Supplier Feedback, Scorecards & Continuous Improvement

EvaluationsHub complements your supply chain stack by giving you a structured system for measuring supplier performance, collecting feedback, and triggering improvements.

Instead of chasing answers in spreadsheets or scattered survey tools, you can:

  • Launch evaluation templates (ESG, risk, quality, delivery, onboarding)

  • Push them to internal teams, customers, or suppliers

  • Automatically score results and track follow-ups

  • Offer suppliers a branded experience with custom portals

  • Close the loop — and prove it

It’s not about tracking POs. It’s about tracking performance.

Comparison: EvaluationsHub vs. Anvyl

Gatekeeper EvaluationsHub
Main Focus Contract Management Feedback Automation & Multi-Metric Evaluation
Integration Capabilities
<

Limited compared to specialized evaluation platforms
<

Broad integration with over 1600 tools including Salesforce


<

Pricing Model
<

Varies based on features used; typically enterprise-level pricing
<

Potentially cost-effective at “3€/managed customer/supplier” (requires validation)


<

Capability Anvyl EvaluationsHub
Primary Focus Supply chain visibility & PO tracking Supplier & customer evaluation and feedback
Purchase Order Management ✔️ Core feature ✖️ Not in scope
Evaluation Workflows ✖️ Not supported ✔️ Built-in engine for supplier/customer/internal assessments
ESG/Risk/Quality Templates ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – standard and customizable
Internal Feedback Collection ✖️ Not a focus ✔️ Push templates across departments easily
Automated Scorecards ✖️ Manual at best ✔️ Automatic scoring, aggregation, and reporting
Reminders & Loop Closure ✖️ No ✔️ Smart automation of follow-ups and actions
Branded Supplier Portals ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – provide co-branded experience to suppliers or customers
Use in Onboarding / Post-Delivery ✖️ Not designed for it ✔️ Ideal for onboarding evaluations, project feedback, and audits
Pricing & Implementation Mid to high, focused on ops Modular, transparent, fast to deploy

Why Procurement Teams Are Layering in EvaluationsHub

Many operations teams using Anvyl or similar tools eventually find themselves needing a better way to:

That’s exactly where EvaluationsHub steps in.

You can keep Anvyl for PO tracking—but plug in EvaluationsHub to run structured evaluations that drive accountability and improvement.

It’s the missing feedback layer that transforms good suppliers into great ones.

Final Thoughts

Anvyl is a solid tool for managing transactions.
EvaluationsHub is built for managing performance.

If your goal is to build stronger supplier relationships, track results over time, and engage your stakeholders in meaningful evaluations, EvaluationsHub gives you the automation and structure that Anvyl doesn’t aim to provide.

See the Difference in a Real Use Case

EvaluationsHub lets you launch a fully managed evaluation for free—so you can try it without technical setup or sales friction.

👉 Start your first structured evaluation now

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

In today’s rapidly evolving procurement landscape, companies demand more than just a supplier database—they need actionable insights, automated workflows, and real accountability. Two platforms often compared in this space are TealBook and EvaluationsHub. While both aim to support smarter supplier decisions, they take very different approaches.

If you’re looking for a platform that doesn’t just collect supplier data but actively manages evaluations, automates scorecards, and closes the feedback loop, EvaluationsHub may be the better fit. Let’s break down why.

TealBook: A Data Platform with Limits

TealBook is best known for its AI-driven supplier discovery and enrichment platform. It aggregates supplier data from various sources, cleans it, and makes it searchable, allowing procurement teams to discover new suppliers or validate existing ones. For vendor master enrichment, it’s a powerful engine.

But here’s the catch: TealBook stops at the data layer. It doesn’t run supplier evaluations, manage projects, or integrate dynamic feedback loops from internal or external stakeholders. It’s a static snapshot in a world that demands real-time, continuous improvement.

EvaluationsHub: Purpose-Built for Procurement Impact

EvaluationsHub goes further—it operationalizes supplier evaluations across your ecosystem, helping procurement teams not just track supplier performance, but improve it. Whether you want to run sustainability assessments, risk audits, or quality evaluations, EvaluationsHub allows you to push templates to suppliers, collect feedback automatically, and hold stakeholders accountable through closed-loop processes.

It isn’t just about data; it’s about delivering outcomes—faster decisions, better supplier performance, and measurable compliance.

Side-by-Side Comparison: TealBook vs. EvaluationsHub

Feature/Capability TealBook EvaluationsHub
Core Purpose Supplier data discovery and enrichment Supplier evaluations, feedback, and project execution
AI Supplier Discovery ✔️ Strong ✖️ Not the focus
Supplier Data Enrichment ✔️ Yes, centralized from multiple sources ✔️ Via direct evaluations from internal & external users
Dynamic Supplier Scorecards ✖️ Not offered ✔️ Fully automated and customizable
Push Templates to Stakeholders ✖️ No ✔️ Yes, including sustainability, risk, quality, etc.
Internal + External Feedback Loops ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – across departments, customers, and suppliers
Closed-Loop Accountability ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – track actions & responses
Custom Supplier Portals ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – branded portals for suppliers or customers
Pricing High, enterprise-level contracts Transparent, flexible, and affordable plans
Time to Value Weeks/months (data setup) Days – runs out-of-the-box with little setup
ISO Certification Support ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – e.g. ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ESG templates
Integration with Evaluation Tools ✖️ Not designed for it ✔️ Integrates with survey tools, NPS, 3rd-party workflows via Make.com
Use Case Breadth Supplier visibility Supplier improvement, risk, ESG, quality, onboarding, customer projects

Why Procurement Teams Are Choosing EvaluationsHub

If your main challenge is simply finding suppliers, TealBook is a solid choice. But if your real bottleneck is managing supplier performance, driving ESG or quality compliance, and automating scorecards across departments, EvaluationsHub gives you the tools to act—not just observe.

With EvaluationsHub, you can:

  • Push a standardized sustainability evaluation to 100+ suppliers in minutes

  • Let internal teams rate vendor performance quarterly without reminders

  • Provide customers with a branded portal to run co-developed initiatives

  • Create a traceable audit trail to support ISO certification

  • And much more—all without needing a separate BI team or manual follow-ups

The Verdict

TealBook gives you data. EvaluationsHub gives you action.
Procurement teams today aren’t short on supplier names—they’re short on time, insight, and operational leverage. EvaluationsHub fills that gap with a system that runs evaluations for you, tracks results, and keeps everyone accountable.

So if you’re ready to move from static supplier lists to living performance ecosystems, it’s time to give EvaluationsHub a try.

Curious how EvaluationsHub fits into your stack?

You can test it for free with one fully managed account — not a demo, but a real proof of concept.

👉 Start here with your first evaluation

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

Aravo vs. EvaluationsHub: Who Wins on Supplier Evaluations, Speed, and Accountability?

In highly regulated industries, Aravo is a well-known name. It provides governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) software designed to help enterprises manage third-party risk. But when procurement teams, quality managers, or sustainability leaders want to run evaluations, automate scorecards, and create accountability—Aravo often becomes too heavy, too slow, and too complex.

That’s where EvaluationsHub comes in.

EvaluationsHub is purpose-built to run supplier and customer evaluations at scale, across multiple departments and use cases—without the implementation burden or price tag of legacy GRC platforms.

If your team is stuck between spreadsheets, compliance checklists, and overly complex software, this comparison is for you.

Aravo: Powerful, but Process-Heavy

Aravo excels at enterprise-level compliance workflows. It offers powerful GRC functionality for regulated industries like financial services, pharma, and defense. But many users describe the platform as slow to configure, difficult to maintain, and dependent on consultants for changes.

For companies that simply want to:

  • Roll out ESG or risk assessments

  • Automate supplier scorecards

  • Collect post-onboarding feedback

  • Track supplier or customer actions

…it’s too much tool for too little agility.

EvaluationsHub: Focused, Fast, and Feedback-Driven

EvaluationsHub strips away the complexity. It focuses entirely on what modern supplier and customer-facing teams need most: structured evaluations, smart automation, and fast deployment.

From supplier risk scorecards to post-project customer reviews, EvaluationsHub helps you:

  • Push templates to any stakeholder (internal or external)

  • Collect and score feedback automatically

  • Track next steps with full accountability

  • Close the loop — and prove it

You don’t need to build a GRC program. You just need a platform that makes evaluations work.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Aravo vs. EvaluationsHub

Feature/Capability Aravo EvaluationsHub
Primary Focus GRC / Risk Management Supplier & customer evaluations, scorecards, feedback loops
Regulatory Compliance ✔️ Deep capabilities ✔️ Supports ISO, ESG, and risk evaluations
Speed of Implementation ⚠️ 6–12 months typical ✅ Days – run evaluations from day one
Supplier Scorecards ✔️ With configuration ✔️ Native, automated, and flexible
Internal Department Feedback ✖️ Not a core use case ✔️ Easily push to any internal stakeholder
Customer-Facing Evaluations ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – full portal and branded experience
Template Flexibility ⚠️ Complex, consultant-driven ✔️ Drag-and-drop builder, no-code
Automation (reminders, scoring) ⚠️ Limited without config ✔️ Fully automated
Accountability & Loop Closure ✔️ With custom workflows ✔️ Built-in, per evaluation or question
Usability for Non-Experts ⚠️ Steep learning curve ✔️ Simple UX for any user
Pricing Enterprise-level Modular, affordable, includes 1 free managed account

Why EvaluationsHub Is the Smarter Fit for Agile Teams

Aravo makes sense for highly regulated companies with full-scale risk teams and long timelines. But if you’re a procurement leader, CX lead, or sustainability manager who needs to run evaluations quickly, gather structured input from multiple parties, and track what happens next, then Aravo is probably overkill.

EvaluationsHub gives you:

  • A flexible evaluation engine

  • Supplier and customer portals

  • A system that holds stakeholders accountable

  • Reports and scorecards without the spreadsheet chaos

All with minimal training and no need for a systems integrator.

Final Verdict

Aravo helps large enterprises check boxes.
EvaluationsHub helps modern teams drive outcomes.

If you want to move from compliance fatigue to continuous performance improvement, EvaluationsHub is the faster, leaner, and smarter path forward.

See It Live – Try EvaluationsHub with a Real Use Case

No sandbox. No sales calls. Just one fully managed free account to show how it works in your live workflow.

👉 Start your first evaluation here

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

Introduction

In today’s fast-paced business environment, choosing the right evaluation platform can significantly impact your organization’s efficiency and decision-making capabilities. This article provides a detailed comparison between two prominent platforms: Graphite Connect and EvaluationsHub. By examining their features, integrations, and unique offerings, we aim to help you make an informed decision that aligns with your business needs.

Key Features Comparison

 

Feature EvaluationsHub Graphite Connect
Feedback Automation Central to its offering, minimizing manual effort. Lacks dedicated automation for feedback processes.
Customizable Evaluations Tailored scorecards, criteria, and methods available. Standardized evaluation templates with limited customization options.
Multi-Metric Evaluation Diverse methods for a comprehensive view. Mainly focuses on basic metrics without extensive multi-metric support.

📊 Graphite Connect vs EvaluationsHub: Feature Comparison

Feature Graphite Connect EvaluationsHub
Core Focus Supplier onboarding and risk management Supplier evaluations and performance management
Automation Automates supplier onboarding, risk scoring, and data validation Automates evaluation workflows, scoring, and feedback collection
Customization Custom workflows and document management Highly customizable scorecards, criteria, and evaluation templates
Integration Capabilities Full integration with ERPs and procurement tools Fully Integrates with over 1600 tools, including all major SRM systems
Supplier Risk Management Built-in risk scoring, OFAC/TIN validation, and fraud prevention part of the full collection of  supplier performance evaluations
Collaboration Tools In-app communication, centralized document sharing Real-time collaboration on evaluations, comments, and scoring
Data Management Single supplier profile shared across the network; validated and secure Centralized evaluation data with historical tracking and analytics
Security & Compliance Features including audit trails and fraud prevention Strong security features, GDPR-compliant, with secure access controls and audit logs
User Experience Designed for procurement teams; some users report friction when adding new contacts Designed for evaluators and procurement teams; praised for ease of use and flexibility
Pricing Model Based on modules, number of suppliers, and onboarding volume (e.g., $25,000/year flat rate reported) Very predictable pricing. Per supplier account starting at 3€ per month, everything unlimited.

source: Capterra 

Differentiators of EvaluationsHub

The following aspects highlight why EvaluationsHub stands out in the market:

  • Broad Integration: With connectivity across over 1600 tools, including strong integration with Salesforce, EvaluationsHub ensures seamless data flow within existing systems.
  • User-Friendly Platform: Its no-code setup allows users to easily create evaluations and manage feedback without technical expertise.
  • Actionable Insights: Provides data-driven reports that facilitate informed decision-making processes based on collected feedback.
  • Simplified Supplier Engagement: The dedicated supplier portal offers a specific interface for suppliers to interact efficiently with the platform’s functionalities.
  • Cost-effective model: A potential pricing model of “3€/managed customer/supplier” suggests affordability compared to high-cost enterprise suites.

User Experience & Security Considerations

The user experience is crucial when selecting an evaluation platform. EvaluationsHub prioritizes ease of use through its intuitive interface that requires no coding skills. Additionally, its commitment towards GDPR compliance underscores robust security measures ensuring data privacy—a critical factor in today’s regulatory landscape.

In contrast, Graphite Connect offers standard user interfaces but lacks advanced customization options found in EvaluationsHub’s white-labeling capability which allows businesses to brand their platforms according to company guidelines.

Pricing & Trial Options

A significant advantage offered by Evaluation Hub includes free trials or versions enabling potential customers low-barrier access before committing financially—an attractive proposition especially for small-to-medium enterprises looking to test functionalities firsthand without upfront costs involved initially.

GraphiteConnect does not provide similar flexible entry points making it less appealing particularly for budget-conscious organizations exploring new solutions within constrained financial frameworks.

Conclusion

This comparison highlights how both platforms cater differently depending on specific organizational requirements; however, EvaluationsHub emerges as amore versatile choice given its extensive feature set coupled with competitive pricing models and superior integration capabilities—all contributing factors towards enhanced operational efficiency and strategic growth opportunities long-term.

Posted on by Bert Paesbrugghe

Which Platform Gives You More Than Just Supplier Data?

As procurement teams seek to modernize their supplier management practices, two names frequently surface in the conversation: Kodiak Hub and EvaluationsHub. Both tools are purpose-built for supplier-related insights, but they serve different philosophies.

Kodiak Hub is a well-designed supplier intelligence platform focused on organizing and centralizing supplier data. It emphasizes structured supplier profiles, risk tracking, and visual dashboards.
But if your team needs to run actual evaluations, automate scorecards, and drive real behavioral change across suppliers and internal stakeholders, EvaluationsHub goes further.

Let’s dig into the differences—and why more teams are choosing EvaluationsHub to turn supplier evaluations into measurable impact.

Kodiak Hub: Structured Intelligence, Light Execution

Kodiak Hub provides a clean interface for gathering and managing supplier-related data. Its strength lies in its modular dashboards, clean UI, and supplier intelligence profiles. It’s ideal for centralizing third-party data and risk indicators.

However, its workflows are relatively static. The platform doesn’t focus on the push-pull mechanisms needed to actually run evaluations, onboard feedback from internal departments, or request structured input from suppliers or customers in an automated, high-frequency way.

It’s good for visibility—but not designed for execution.

EvaluationsHub: Automated Evaluation Engine Built for Results

Where Kodiak Hub ends, EvaluationsHub begins. EvaluationsHub is all about automating the evaluation process across procurement, quality, sustainability, and CX.

Whether you want to:

  • Roll out a supplier ESG assessment

  • Automate quarterly supplier scorecards

  • Run post-onboarding evaluations with customers

  • Push structured risk or quality templates

EvaluationsHub lets you do it in minutes, with full tracking and accountability—not weeks of prep and manual follow-ups.

Side-by-Side Comparison: Kodiak Hub vs. EvaluationsHub

Feature/Capability Kodiak Hub EvaluationsHub
Platform Focus Supplier intelligence and data structuring Cross-functional evaluation and feedback automation
Supplier Profiles ✔️ Yes – detailed and visual ✔️ Yes – enriched through direct evaluations
Supplier Scorecards ✔️ Manual setup, static ✔️ Fully automated, customizable & recurring
Internal Department Feedback ✖️ Not core to platform ✔️ Built-in, push evaluations to any stakeholder
ESG/Risk/Compliance Templates ✔️ Pre-defined modules ✔️ Custom templates with full automation
Execution Workflow Automation ✖️ Limited ✔️ End-to-end automated workflows
Push Templates to Suppliers ✖️ Not primary focus ✔️ Yes – with tracking and reminders
Customer-Facing Evaluations ✖️ No ✔️ Yes – with branded portals for customers
Audit Trails & Accountability ✔️ Yes ✔️ Yes – with action tracking per evaluation
Time to Deploy Weeks/months (depending on modules) Days – live out of the box
Pricing Enterprise/negotiated Modular, transparent, and includes a free managed account

Why EvaluationsHub Wins on Speed, Flexibility, and Impact

Procurement teams using Kodiak Hub often gain better visibility—but still end up managing evaluations, scorecards, or post-project reviews manually, in Excel, or with scattered surveys.

EvaluationsHub was built specifically to fix that.

It gives you:

  • Evaluation templates for suppliers, customers, or internal teams

  • Automated reminders, scoring, and analysis

  • Fully branded, traceable, and standardized workflows

  • Clear accountability for next steps and follow-up actions

This is not just a platform to “see supplier data”—it’s a platform to act on it, every quarter, project, or initiative.

The Verdict

Kodiak Hub gives you visibility and structured supplier insights.
EvaluationsHub gives you action, automation, and accountability across the full stakeholder map.

If you want to modernize how your organization evaluates performance—and stop managing it in spreadsheets or siloed tools—EvaluationsHub is your next move.

Experience EvaluationsHub for Free – No Sales Calls Required

We don’t hide behind demos. Start with a fully managed, free account or unlimited trial and see how fast you can get real feedback and evaluations up and running.

👉 Try your first automated evaluation

Key Features Comparison

Feature Kodiak Hub EvaluationsHub
Feedback Automation Limited automation options Central to its offering, minimizing manual effort
Customizable Evaluations Standard templates available Highly customizable scorecards, criteria, and methods
Multi-Metric Evaluation Lacks comprehensive multi-metric support Able to use many different methods for a comprehensive view
Integration Capabilities Select integrations available (e.g., ERP systems) Broad integration with over 1600 tools; strong connectivity with Salesforce emphasized
User Interface/Usability Slight learning curve User-friendly/no-code platform for ease of setup and use

Unique Offerings

EvaluationsHub stands out due to several key differentiators that cater to modern businesses’ needs. Its feedback automation feature is central to its offering, reducing the manual effort required in collecting and analyzing evaluations. The platform’s ability to provide highly customizable evaluations allows organizations to tailor scorecards and criteria according to their specific requirements.

Moreover EvaluationsHub’s multi-metric evaluation capability enables users to employ various methods for a more comprehensive assessment of performance or feedback data. This is complemented by its broad integration capabilities which include connectivity with over 1600 tools particularly emphasizing seamless integration with Salesforce.

Supplier Portal

A dedicated supplier portal further distinguishes EvaluationsHub by providing suppliers with a specific interface for engagement enhancing collaboration and communication between businesses and their suppliers.

Data-Driven Insights

The platform excels in delivering actionable insights through robust reporting features focusing on data-driven decision-making from collected feedback. Additionally it supports corrective action planning (CAPA) directly addressing identified issues ensuring continuous improvement processes are in place.

Customization & Compliance

With brandable white-labeling options companies can customize the appearance of the platform aligning it with their branding guidelines while maintaining GDPR compliance demonstrating a strong focus on data security privacy concerns.