In today’s fast-paced business environment, choosing the right evaluation and feedback platform is crucial for maintaining competitive advantage. Two prominent players in this space are Resilinc and EvaluationsHub. This article provides a detailed comparison of these platforms, highlighting their features, integrations, and unique offerings to help you make an informed decision.

Key Features Comparison

<

Feature EvaluationsHub Resilinc
Feedback Automation Yes – Minimizes manual effort No direct equivalent
Customizable Evaluations Highly customizable with tailored scorecards and criteria Limited customization options available
Multi-Metric Evaluation Diverse methods for comprehensive insights Lacks multi-metric capabilities as extensive as EvaluationsHub’s offering
Integration Capabilities Broad integration with 1600+ tools including Salesforce emphasis Narrower range of integrations compared to EvaluationsHub’s extensive network
User Interface & Customization


User-Friendly/No-Code Platform


Brandable/White-Labeling


GDPR Compliance


Cost-Effective Pricing Model

Dedicated Supplier Portal

Actionable Insights/Reporting

Corrective Action Planning (CAPA)

  • No-Code Platform: Easy setup and use for evaluations.
  • User-Friendly: Intuitive interface.
  • No-Code Platform: Easy setup and use for evaluations.
  • User-Friendly: Intuitive interface.

The platform offers a dedicated supplier portal that allows suppliers to engage directly with the system. This feature enhances communication efficiency between businesses and their suppliers.

The platform focuses on data-driven decision-making by providing actionable insights from feedback. This allows businesses to make informed decisions based on comprehensive reports generated by the system.

This feature supports addressing identified issues through corrective action planning. It ensures that problems are not only identified but also resolved efficiently.

Differentiators of EvaluationsHub Over Resilinc:

  • User-Friendly Interface: EvaluationsHub prioritizes ease of use with its no-code platform, making it accessible even for those without technical expertise.
  • Feedback Automation: Unlike Resilinc, EvaluationsHub automates feedback processes, significantly reducing manual efforts.
  • Diverse Integration: With over 1600 tool integrations, including a strong focus on Salesforce connectivity, it offers unmatched flexibility in connecting with existing systems.
  • Simplified Pricing Model: The potential cost-effectiveness of a per-supplier or per-customer pricing model makes it appealing for businesses looking to optimize costs without sacrificing functionality.

The Bottom Line: Why Choose EvaluationsHub?

If your organization values automation, customization, broad integration capabilities, and actionable insights from evaluations while ensuring GDPR compliance at a potentially cost-effective rate, EvaluationsHub warrants serious consideration over its competitors like Resilinc.

EvaluationsHub publishes this comparison, so treat it as an interested party’s account and check the links. Every claim about HICX is sourced to a page HICX publishes, with the date we read it. Where something is not public, we say so rather than guessing. Last reviewed 29 September 2026.

The short version

HICX and EvaluationsHub answer different questions. HICX is built to be the authoritative supplier record across a complicated system landscape. EvaluationsHub is built to run the supplier lifecycle itself: sourcing suppliers in, scoring them on a cadence, and closing the corrective actions that come out of it.

If no two of your systems agree on who a supplier is, that is HICX’s problem to solve. If you know exactly who your suppliers are and still cannot say which ones are improving, that is ours.

What HICX is

HICX is an enterprise supplier management platform, founded in 2004 and headquartered in London. Dafydd Llewellyn was announced as CEO in September 2025, with co-founder Costas Xyloyiannis moving to non-executive Chairman. The company raised $30 million in September 2022, led by Wavecrest Growth Partners. (About, CEO announcement, funding.)

HICX is direct about its centre of gravity. On its Supplier Information Management page it states: "HICX is only for supplier data. We’re a domain-expert supplier master data management provider focused on delivering real value to business users in Procurement, Supply Chain, Finance and beyond." (Source.)

It publishes five platform components: a Supplier Data Foundation for master data, Supplier Information Management, Supplier Process Orchestration, a Business Portal for internal teams, and a Supplier Portal as "one front door for all suppliers". (Source.)

Where HICX is the stronger choice

This section is honest, because the rest of the page is worth nothing otherwise.

One supplier record across many ERP and AP systems. Their best-evidenced claim, backed by named cases. AutoNation consolidated 13 regional ERPs plus PeopleSoft and 14 accounts payable systems into "a single source of truth, one point of data entry that feeds to all ERP systems". EDF Energy’s head of procurement directorate is quoted on de-duplication inside SAP being "probably the biggest challenge". Their integration page cites implementations "involving tens or even hundreds of ERP instances from multiple vendors". (AutoNation, EDF, integration.)

Very large supplier populations. HICX states its Supplier Portal supports "hundreds of thousands of suppliers per client" and moves data loads with "millions of data attributes" in minutes. (Source.)

Formal process modelling. Supplier Process Orchestration is described as no-code, built on "all standard BPMN features", with a template library so workflows can be edited "with no need for IT support". If your supplier processes must be modelled formally and signed off as diagrams, that is a real capability. (Source.)

Third-party validation wired into the record. HICX Origin connects supplier records to "40+ trusted data sources", with named data partners including Dun & Bradstreet, EcoVadis, OFAC, Melissa and Swift. Bank account and W-8/W-9 document validation were added in Q1 2026. (Partners, what’s new.)

Supplier performance management is a real HICX capability, not a gap. They publish a use case titled "Supplier performance scored on data, not gut feel", covering scorecards from a KPI library, weighted scoring across quality, delivery, cost and sustainability, automated scoring cycles, threshold alerts, corrective actions triggered on underperformance, and supplier-visible scorecards. Any comparison claiming HICX cannot do performance management is wrong. (Source.)

Analyst recognition. HICX is a named Sample Vendor for Supplier Information Management in the Gartner Hype Cycle for Procurement and Sourcing Solutions, 2026. Gartner’s own disclaimer is reproduced on their announcement: Gartner "does not endorse any company, vendor, product or service depicted in its publications". Inclusion as a Sample Vendor is not a ranking. (Source.)

What EvaluationsHub is

EvaluationsHub is a full supplier lifecycle management platform. Two integrated products cover the lifecycle end to end, sharing one supplier record, one permission model and one reporting layer rather than sitting next to each other and exchanging files.

InitiativesHub covers everything before the relationship exists: intake and needs capture, RFx across RFI, RFQ and RFP with bid comparison, qualification scoring and selection, awarding, contract with SLA and renewal alerts, and guided onboarding.

EvaluationsHub covers everything after it does: continuous risk scoring, CSRD-ready ESG evidence collection, weighted performance KPIs, corrective actions triggered automatically with owners and due dates, and quarterly business reviews. Eva AI cross-checks contract obligations against live performance data and flags drift against your acceptance thresholds, with human approval required before anything executes.

That is the whole lifecycle in one platform: intake, sourcing, award, onboarding, performance, risk, compliance, corrective action and review. Four design decisions matter in a comparison like this one.

The evaluation cadence is the product, not a reporting module. Scoring, reminders, escalation, CAPA recurrence and document collection are included in every deployment rather than sold as automation add-ons. Suppliers work inside the same two-way workspace, see their own scorecard, and close actions with you.

Multi-stakeholder scoring is native. Quality, operations, engineering and category management score the same supplier against weighted criteria, and the platform resolves that into one comparable result instead of one buyer’s opinion.

Standalone or layered, your choice. No ERP is required. Import your supplier list and run the full lifecycle, or layer it on SAP, Oracle, Dynamics or Coupa with bidirectional sync and no duplicate entry. You do not need a master data programme to finish before you can start measuring performance, and most teams run their first evaluation cycle in three to four weeks with their own suppliers and data.

European by default, enterprise-ready. ISO 27001 certified, hosted on AWS eu-west-3 in Paris, encrypted at rest and in transit, data does not leave Europe, DPA on request. Larger deployments run SSO and SAML with Okta, Azure AD or Google Workspace, SCIM provisioning, and multi-entity governance. Rated 4.9 out of 5 on G2, across 350+ procurement teams.

Side by side

HICX and EvaluationsHub compared. HICX claims sourced to their own pages read 29 September 2026. "Not published" means the vendor does not state it publicly.
Dimension HICX EvaluationsHub Who this favours
Master data across many ERP instances Core capability, named case evidence at 13 ERPs plus 14 AP systems Bidirectional sync with your ERP as system of record, not a replacement for it HICX where consolidating the record is the project
Very large supplier populations States hundreds of thousands of suppliers per client Volume tiers to enterprise scale with multi-entity governance and SSO HICX at the extreme end of supplier count
Formal process modelling No-code orchestration on standard BPMN Configurable lifecycle and action workflows, not BPMN diagrams HICX if processes must be modelled formally
Third-party validation network 40+ data sources; D&B, EcoVadis, OFAC, Melissa, Swift Data arrives by import or integration; validation handled by your chosen providers HICX. Sanctions screening and bank validation are theirs
Sourcing before the relationship exists Supplier Registration and Onboarding are published modules. RFx, bid comparison and awarding are not among them InitiativesHub covers intake, RFx across RFI, RFQ and RFP, qualification, awarding and contract EvaluationsHub. One platform from need to scorecard
Evaluation cadence and escalation Automated scoring cycles and threshold alerts are published The cadence is the product: recurrence, reminders, escalation and CAPA follow-up included in every deployment EvaluationsHub on depth of the review loop
Multi-stakeholder internal scoring Not published as a named capability Native. Quality, operations, engineering and category management score the same supplier and the platform resolves one comparable result EvaluationsHub
Contract obligations versus live performance Purchase Order and Invoice Visibility is published. Obligation versus performance cross-checking is not Eva AI cross-checks obligations against delivered performance and flags drift, with human approval before action EvaluationsHub for value leakage and contract drift
Published time to a running cycle Not published. Only customer datapoints: Mondelez live in under 12 months globally, one unnamed client at 20 ERP instances under 12 months First evaluation cycle in three to four weeks, configured by your own team, no ERP required EvaluationsHub on speed to first result. The scopes differ
Commercial model Not published. G2 records pricing not listed by the vendor Per supplier actively managed, not per seat. Internal team and all supplier portal users included. Volume tiers automatic EvaluationsHub. You can reason about cost before a call
Data residency Single-tenant architecture, role-based access, SSO. Hosting region not published AWS eu-west-3 Paris, ISO 27001, data stays in Europe, DPA on request EvaluationsHub if EU residency is a requirement. HICX if single tenancy is
ESG and CSRD evidence Configurable questionnaires, export-ready reporting, EcoVadis partnership Structured ESG collection running continuously, audit-ready rather than assembled before an audit Both, and both are credible

Choose HICX if

  • You run many ERP or accounts payable instances and no two agree on who a supplier is.
  • Your supplier base runs to the hundreds of thousands, or data volumes to millions of attributes.
  • Duplicated supplier master data is what is costing you money, ahead of performance measurement.
  • You need one governed supplier front door with single sign-on, replacing several supplier logins.
  • Supplier processes must be modelled formally in BPMN and signed off as diagrams.
  • Single-tenant deployment is a hard requirement from procurement or IT.
  • You want sanctions screening, sustainability ratings and bank validation supplied by the vendor.

Choose EvaluationsHub if

  • You want one platform from intake and RFx through to the scorecard and the closed corrective action, rather than a sourcing tool and a performance tool that do not share a record.
  • The review loop is the point: recurrence, reminders, escalation and corrective actions that actually close, with the supplier working the plan in the same place you are.
  • Several functions need to score the same supplier and you want one comparable result rather than one buyer’s opinion.
  • You are chasing value leakage and contract drift, and want obligations checked against what suppliers actually delivered.
  • You want a cycle live in weeks on your own suppliers, without waiting for a master data programme or an ERP integration to finish first.
  • CSRD evidence has to be collected continuously rather than assembled in a panic before an audit.
  • EU data residency matters, and ISO 27001 plus AWS Paris answers your security review.

What we cannot tell you

  • How HICX prices. They publish nothing on it, so you will have to ask them.
  • How long a HICX implementation takes in general. No standard timeline is published. The two public figures are customer datapoints for global multi-ERP programmes, which tell you about those programmes rather than yours.
  • Which ERPs HICX has pre-built connectors for. They claim connectors for all major ERP, procurement and supply chain software but publish no named list. SAP and PeopleSoft appear in their case studies. Ask for the list.
  • Whether HICX appears in any Forrester Wave. Those reports are paywalled and we could not verify either way, so we make no claim.
  • How their software feels in practice. We have read their documentation. We have not run it, and we will not characterise software we have not used.

Where that leaves you

If consolidating the supplier record is the project, HICX is a serious, long-established answer and we would rather you heard that from us than discovered it after buying the wrong thing.

If the record is fine and the problem is that nobody is scored on a cadence, nothing gets escalated, and last quarter’s corrective actions are still open, that is the lifecycle we run, and you can be inside a real cycle within a month.

Talk to us about your supplier programme, or see how pricing works.

In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, organizations are increasingly relying on evaluation platforms to streamline their feedback processes and enhance decision-making. Two prominent players in this domain are Gatekeeper and EvaluationsHub. This article provides a comprehensive comparison of these two platforms, highlighting their key features, strengths, and differentiators.

Overview of Gatekeeper

Gatekeeper is a well-established platform known for its robust contract management capabilities. It offers a suite of tools designed to help businesses manage vendor relationships effectively. Key features include automated workflows, contract lifecycle management, and compliance tracking. While it excels in contract management, its evaluation capabilities may not be as extensive as some specialized platforms.

Overview of EvaluationsHub

EvaluationsHub stands out with its focus on feedback automation and multi-metric evaluations. It offers highly customizable evaluations tailored to specific business needs, allowing users to create personalized scorecards and criteria. With broad integration capabilities (over 1600 tools), particularly strong connectivity with Salesforce, EvaluationsHub ensures seamless data flow across existing software ecosystems.

Key Differentiators of EvaluationsHub

  • Feedback Automation: Minimizes manual effort by automating the feedback process.
  • Highly Customizable Evaluations: Allows for tailored scorecards and criteria specific to organizational needs.
  • Multi-Metric Evaluation: Provides a comprehensive view using various evaluation methods.
  • Broad Integration: Seamlessly connects with over 1600 tools including Salesforce.
  • User-Friendly/No-Code Platform: Easy setup and use without technical expertise required.
  • Brandable/White-Labeling: Customizes the platform’s appearance with company branding.
  • COST-EFFECTIVE PRICING MODEL:: Potentially competitive pricing at “3€/managed customer/supplier.”

A Detailed Comparison Table

<

<

>
<<>User-Friendliness <<>
<<>Requires some technical knowledge <<>
<<>No-code platform; easy setup <<>
<<

>


<<<

>>
<<>Data Security<<>>
<<>Standard security measures<<>>
<<>GDPR compliant; strong focus on privacy<<>>
<<<

>>

Conclusion

Both Gatekeeper and EvaluationsHub offer valuable solutions depending on your organization’s needs.
If your primary focus is on robust contract management,
Gatekeeper may be the right choice.
However,
if you seek an advanced evaluation platform that emphasizes customization,
automation,
broad integrations,
user-friendliness,
brandability
,and cost-effectiveness
,EvaluationsHub emerges as a compelling option.

Avetta vs. EvaluationsHub: From Box-Ticking to Real Supplier Improvement

If your business depends on third parties—suppliers, contractors, vendors—you’ve likely heard of Avetta. Known for managing supplier pre-qualification and compliance in high-risk industries like construction and energy, Avetta helps companies enforce safety and regulatory standards.

But if you need to go beyond compliance and actually evaluate supplier performance, gather structured internal feedback, and drive ongoing improvement, you’ll find that Avetta’s system isn’t built for that.

That’s where EvaluationsHub enters the picture.

While Avetta keeps you compliant, EvaluationsHub helps you continuously improve supplier performance, engagement, and accountability.

Let’s explore the difference.


What Avetta Does Well

Avetta’s platform focuses on qualifying vendors before work begins. It’s designed to:

  • Verify insurance, safety records, certifications, and financial standing

  • Provide risk ratings based on documentation

  • Act as a clearinghouse for contractor onboarding

This makes it suitable for industries like construction, oil & gas, and utilities—especially where regulatory or safety standards must be met before a supplier sets foot on-site.

But after the vendor is approved, Avetta doesn’t give you much for ongoing performance evaluations. There’s no structured way to collect input from procurement, sustainability, or operations. No automated scorecards. No CX or onboarding feedback loops. Just a profile—and a lot of PDFs.


EvaluationsHub: Built for Ongoing Supplier (and Customer) Evaluation

EvaluationsHub goes beyond qualification. It gives you a fast, flexible way to:

  • Launch recurring or one-time evaluations with scoring logic

  • Push templates to internal teams, suppliers, or even customers

  • Aggregate results in dashboards and scorecards automatically

  • Trigger follow-ups and assign accountability

  • Offer a seamless branded portal experience for each stakeholder

From ESG audits to supplier scorecards to post-project evaluations, EvaluationsHub turns fragmented feedback into a structured system that creates measurable outcomes.


Feature Comparison: Avetta vs. EvaluationsHub

Gatekeeper EvaluationsHub
Main Focus Contract Management Feedback Automation & Multi-Metric Evaluation
Integration Capabilities
<

Limited compared to specialized evaluation platforms
<

Broad integration with over 1600 tools including Salesforce


<

Pricing Model
<

Varies based on features used; typically enterprise-level pricing
<

Potentially cost-effective at “3€/managed customer/supplier” (requires validation)


<

Capability Avetta EvaluationsHub
Primary Focus Supplier pre-qualification & compliance Evaluation & improvement across suppliers, customers, and teams
Vendor Pre-Qualification ✅ Core function ✖️ Not a focus
Document Management & Audits ✅ Built-in for compliance ⚠️ Light support (links, references in templates)
Supplier Performance Evaluations ⚠️ Basic rating indicators ✅ Custom templates, scoring logic, trend analysis
Internal Feedback Collection ✖️ Not supported ✅ Push to departments: procurement, quality, sustainability, etc.
Post-Onboarding / Project Reviews ✖️ Not supported ✅ Built-in use cases for CX & delivery follow-up
Automated Reminders & Scoring ✖️ Manual follow-up ✅ Fully automated
Customer / Supplier Portals ✖️ Static vendor profiles ✅ Fully branded, dynamic, stakeholder-specific portals
Accountability & Loop Closure ✖️ Not tracked ✅ Assigned actions, status tracking per evaluation
Deployment Speed Weeks/months Days – no-code, intuitive setup
Pricing Model Enterprise-level (subscription + onboarding fees) Modular, transparent, includes 1 managed account free

The Real Difference? Compliance vs. Continuous Improvement

Avetta is built to keep you safe and compliant—before the relationship begins.
EvaluationsHub is designed to help you improve that relationship over time.

Most organizations today need both:

But while Avetta ends at onboarding, EvaluationsHub gives you the ongoing insight and structure you need to evaluate, act, and improve—again and again.


Final Word

If you’re only looking to check boxes for safety and documentation, Avetta is likely the right tool.
But if you want to go further—to create real visibility into supplier performance, build accountability, and collect structured input across teams—EvaluationsHub delivers where Avetta doesn’t.

It’s not about replacing what you have. It’s about making it work smarter.


Try EvaluationsHub—Live in Days, Not Months

Skip the sandbox. We’ll set up a real, free managed account so you can launch a complete evaluation with suppliers or internal teams—and see the results immediately.

👉 Start your first structured evaluation