{"id":14861,"date":"2026-03-30T15:50:51","date_gmt":"2026-03-30T15:50:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/?page_id=14861"},"modified":"2026-04-23T21:23:17","modified_gmt":"2026-04-23T21:23:17","slug":"rfx-sourcing-software","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/rfx-sourcing-software\/","title":{"rendered":"RFx Sourcing Software: RFI, RFQ, RFP | EvaluationsHub"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

RFI \/ RFQ \/ RFP<\/p>

Run RFIs, RFQs, and RFPs Without the Spreadsheet Graveyard<\/h1>

Structured sourcing workflows, supplier responses in one place, scored and comparable. From first contact to awarded supplier \u2014 without losing anything in email.<\/p>Start Free Pilot<\/a>See How It Works<\/a><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Trusted by procurement teams at<\/p>

IBM  \u00b7  McCain  \u00b7  Capgemini  \u00b7  Europcar  \u00b7  BT  \u00b7  Firestone  \u00b7  Dell  \u00b7  KLA  \u00b7  Kyndryl  \u00b7  Swiss Krono  \u00b7  Pioneer  \u00b7  Yura<\/p><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

THE PROBLEM<\/p>

Sourcing decisions made on incomplete, incomparable data.<\/h2>

\ud83d\udcca<\/p>

Responses in different formats<\/h3>

When suppliers respond in their own format \u2014 Word docs, PDFs, custom spreadsheets \u2014 comparison becomes a manual exercise that takes days and introduces errors.<\/p><\/div>

\ud83d\udce7<\/p>

No audit trail on decisions<\/h3>

Sourcing decisions made via email threads have no documented rationale. When a supplier challenges an outcome \u2014 or an auditor asks why \u2014 there's no defensible record.<\/p><\/div>

\ud83d\udd17<\/p>

Sourcing disconnected from performance<\/h3>

New suppliers are onboarded without visibility into how similar suppliers have performed. The link between sourcing and supplier performance history doesn't exist.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

HOW IT WORKS<\/p>

Structured RFx workflows \u2014 from questionnaire to scored decision.<\/h2>

Build your RFI, RFQ, or RFP once. Suppliers respond through the portal in a standardised format. Responses are scored, compared, and documented \u2014 ready for sign-off.<\/p>

\ud83c\udfd7\ufe0f<\/p>

Build once, send to many<\/h3>

Create your RFI\/RFQ\/RFP with custom questions and weighting. Invite as many suppliers as needed \u2014 they all respond in the same structure.<\/p><\/div>

\ud83c\udf10<\/p>

Supplier portal responses<\/h3>

Suppliers respond through a branded, mobile-friendly portal. Document uploads, pricing, and qualitative responses \u2014 all in one place, no email required.<\/p><\/div>

\u2696\ufe0f<\/p>

Weighted scoring and comparison<\/h3>

Score responses against your defined criteria with configurable weights. The comparison view shows exactly how each supplier stacks up \u2014 side by side.<\/p><\/div>

\ud83d\udcc2<\/p>

Documented decision trail<\/h3>

Every RFx \u2014 questions, responses, scores, and award decision \u2014 is stored and exportable. Defensible, auditable, and accessible when you need it.<\/p><\/div><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605\u2605<\/div>
\"We were able to activate underperforming suppliers, which was a gamechanger for the whole team.\"<\/blockquote>

A. Declerck  \u00b7  Enterprise Procurement, Chemicals<\/p>

Verified G2 Review  \u00b7  4.9\/5<\/p><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Common questions<\/h2>
Can we run RFI, RFQ, and RFP in the same platform?<\/summary>

Yes. EvaluationsHub supports all three RFx types with configurable templates. You can run them independently or as a sequential process \u2014 RFI to qualify, RFQ to price, RFP to award.<\/p><\/details>

Do suppliers need an account to respond?<\/summary>

Suppliers access the RFx through a secure portal link. They can create a lightweight account or respond as an invited guest \u2014 depending on your configuration.<\/p><\/details>

Is the RFx outcome connected to onboarding and performance evaluation?<\/summary>

Yes. Awarded suppliers move directly into the onboarding workflow, and from there into the ongoing performance evaluation cycle \u2014 creating a continuous supplier lifecycle in one platform.<\/p><\/details><\/div><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t

Run your next sourcing event in days, not weeks.<\/h2>

Structured RFx. Comparable responses. Documented decisions. No spreadsheet required.<\/p>Start Free Pilot<\/a>View Pricing<\/a><\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Run Smarter RFQs. Pick Better Suppliers. RFx processes are slow, inconsistent, and disconnected from supplier performance history. EvaluationsHub connects your sourcing decisions to real performance data \u2014 so you select suppliers based on evidence, not assumption. \u2605 4.9\/5 on G2 \u00b7 Trusted by 350+ procurement teams \u00b7 Official SAP Partner The disconnect between sourcing and […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_templately_pack_id":"","_templately_imported_at":"","_templately_source":"","_templately_import_session_id":"","footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-14861","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14861","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14861"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/pages\/14861\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/evaluationshub.com\/api-v1\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14861"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}